Topic: Governor's Response to Proposition 37

Goldglo

Date: 2009-09-17 17:30 EST
The following transcript of Governor Simon's speech, given on June 3rd, has been made part of the public record and are available at the Rhydin Public Library. Visual records of the speech are also publically available, as are transcripts and records of the subsequent question-and-answer session with the press.

Part I

Standing at the podium, the Governor seems solem. He looks at the cameras directly, speaking deliberatly, rarely looking down at his notes. Clearing his throat, he begins.

Good afternoon. Thank you for coming, tuning in, or reading, as the case may be. As you all are by now aware, my remarks today will concern Proposition Thirty-Seven. Recently, an article written by Darien Fenner in the Rhydin Post quoted some, but not all, of what I said in an interview conducted by Mr. Fenner. There were some implications that my answers were vague and ambiguous; perhaps they were, for at the time I had not yet made a final decision on whether I would or would not endorse the measure. I explained to Mr. Fenner that, at the time of our interview, there were too many unanswered questions, questions that I now have answers to.

Mr. Fenner's article wanted the political merry-go-round to halt. Where we stop, no one knows, he wrote. I hope, today, that I'll remove all ambiguity and doubt of not only my own personal position concerning Proposition Thirty-Seven, but of the direction I'm instructing my cabinet, advisors, and other city-officials to follow.

As I stated to Mr. Fenner, Proposition Thirty-Seven is a highly-charged issue, especially emotionally. Many of you, Rhydin's citizens, feel threatened by it, if not directly, at least by its base principles. We've seen a recent uptick in violence from both the measure's supporters and detractors. There's been rampant fear-mongering, suspicions of and resistance to the application of labels to those capable of utilizing magical abilities, and tragic, entirely preventable deaths. I once again urge all of you, each and every citizen and visitor to this city, to cease this violent behavior. No good can come of it, no good will come of it. The more we fragment, the more we fight with each other, the less able we are to approach each other civilly and rationally on any subject, much less one as controversial as Proposition Thirty-Seven. Please, I implore you " do not continue down this path of violence any longer.

As far as the Proposition itself, for those of you who have read the full text " members here from the press should have been provided copies as you entered today " I agree with some of its points. For example, Section Two, Point One, Sub-Point A, states, "Failure to provide adequate law enforcement is a costly mistake?. That may seem a very general statement, but at its core, it's correct. As Governor, protection of you, the citizens of this city, ultimately falls to me. It's my belief that existing security measures such as the Watch and the Rhydin Air and Space Guard, in the vast majority of situations, are entirely adequate, if not more-so. Are the groups perfect' Of course not; that's why we have constant training, equipment upgrades, and recruitment. Are our security forces capable of ensuring your safety' Most definitely. But you need to play your part as well; the unnecessary violence of late has put extra strain on the Watch and everyone whose job it is to ensure the safety of this city and all of you. We will and continue to respond quickly and effectively to these uprisings, but we sincerely hope they will come to an immediate end.

Goldglo

Date: 2009-09-17 17:33 EST
Part II

Looking around the room once more, the Governor quickly glances at the top of his podium stand before continuing.

There are also several areas of the text I disagree with. Several studies and statistics are mentioned, such as Section Two, Point One, Sub-Point I, which states "Currently, only 13 percent of wild(e) magic, mana is considered regulated" and Sub-Point F, which states "Recent studies have indicated that the crime rate by and among magic-users has escalated 61 percent in the past three years". Other statistics and studies are referenced in other Sub-Points as well. However, neither the Proposition nor its backers have cited any specific studies, nor have they made efforts to explain from where these statistics were derived or who backed and funded these alleged studies. How, then, am I, or are you, to simply accept them at face value"

Let me provide some statistics as well. Did you know, for instance, that 48% of chefs within the city have been cited for health violations" Or that 63% of Rhydin's citizens, which are most of you listening or watching right now, are directly responsible for a 90% degradation of city defense efficiency' Or that 98% of those who live or work in the Dragon's Gate district are culpable, and could be tried in courts, for the violation of Statute 315 on a daily basis" Those may seem, on the surface, fairly damning statistics. But, in simply providing them and no other information to you, you have no knowledge of the timeframe looked at, the number of cases or people polled, or the severity of the violations in the numbers I just mentioned. Statistics and numbers are malleable on any side of an argument, in most cases. Two sides can look at the same study and purport to have found vastly different results. Taken out of context, or even worse, within no context, numbers, studies and statistics mean very little. The studies and statistics provided in the text of Proposition Thirty-Seven fall into that category. With no underlying support, no specific citations, no way to prove or disprove those numbers, none of us should assign them value or act upon them.

Section Two, Sub-Section Two, of Proposition Thirty-Seven, mostly abandons discussions of magic and instead focuses upon weapons registration, background checks, purchasing and training, as well as the monitoring of released criminals, presumably of any criminal regardless of their ability to use magic. It claims that public safety is enhanced when these things occur, but again provides no documentation, no citations, no proof that this is actually the case. The measure thus asks you to take its claims at face value, to blindly accept its assertions. As Governor, I cannot and will not do so and I hope that none of you do so, either.

Proposition Thirty-Seven goes on to claim it will save the city, and you, its citizens, "indefinite amounts of money' by doing several things, including encouraging, but not mandating, education of qualified magic users, restricting the use of magic to qualified users, and mandating the licensing of all magical users who will be listed and watched over by some undetermined governmental group, or, perhaps the M.E.R.C.

First, the measure makes no claim or indication of what exactly "qualified" means, in terms of wielding magic. To me, that's problematic " who's qualified to determine the qualifications of magic users" What standards will be applied" Who will draft and test those standards" The measure states that "the government will recognize and assign equipped"employees capable of arcane modus to an enforcement division' without providing any details of how this recognition, assignment, or equipment will take place.

Second, I fail to see how government sponsored magical educations, licensing and tracking of magic users, and the creation of a new or expansion of an existing bureaucracy to do these things, will save funds. Some money may, and I stress may, be saved in the area of crime prevention, but there's nothing suggesting that'll be the case. It's my belief that any money saved would need to be reassigned and spent in establishing and maintaining this watch list and education practices for which Proposition Thirty-Seven doesn't provide any guidance or details.

Next, let me address the M.E.R.C., or Mage and Enchanter Registration Coalition. To me, this is another area in which Proposition Thirty-Seven falls short. The M.E.R.C., as indicated in the measure's text, will be comprised of no fewer than one-thousand-one-hundred magic users and lead by a division deputy chief also schooled in the use of magic. Presumably, for the measure doesn't specify, M.E.R.C. members would be registered magic users who passed the ambiguous qualification trainings I've already discussed. If, as the measure suggest, magic users are so inclined toward crime and destruction, be it purposeful or accidental, why would you regulate this group with members of its own" Who's to say that M.E.R.C. members are any less violent than any other magic user" Who will select M.E.R.C.'s members" Who will pay for their services" How much will those services cost' Most importantly, will the establishment of M.E.R.C. make you, any of you, any safer than you are today' Proposition Thirty-Seven implies that the M.E.R.C. will do so, but provides no evidence of such.

Goldglo

Date: 2009-09-17 17:33 EST
Part III

Finally, let's examine the last section, Section Five, which, among other things, claims that a "Yes" vote will result in "the institution of the M.E.R.C. to penalize the illegal use of magic(s)". Why do we need the M.E.R.C. to accomplish that task" Magic users and non-magic users are, today, without M.E.R.C, penalized when found guilty of an illegal action. The measure states that a "Yes" vote will mean "the implementation of monitory means for significantly forcible users of the arcane". Again, Proposition Thirty-Seven fails to establish the methods for this monitoring. It contradicts itself in claiming, here, that it will only regulate the 'significantly forcible", without any explanation of what that term means, when it states several other times that all magical users, regardless of skill level, would be subject to regulation, registration, and monitoring. We absolutely cannot and should not vote for a measure such as this " one that makes wild claims with no intelligible support and, within its own wording, is inconsistent.

The Governor shifts his stance and moves out from behind the podium, making sure to speak directly into the cameras in an effort to make those watching feel as if he's talking to them, one on one.

How many of you have hired a magician to perform small wonders at celebrations for your children" How many of you have sought the advice of a fortune teller, or, dare I call them, Diviners" How many of you depend upon magic of some sort in your daily lives, even for small mundane tasks" How many of you were enthralled as children, or are still enthralled, by magical tales and feats" How many of you have relied upon or consulted a magical healer for yourselves, or a loved one, and rejoiced when the malady was cured" What changed between those times to several weeks ago when this measure first came to light, to now"

Nothing's changed, except that Proposition Thirty-Seven and many of its most dedicated supporters are finding success in stirring up unnecessary and illogical fears. They are preying on `what if" and `we think" statements with little to no solid evidence offered to substantiate their claims. Ask yourselves, what more do you have to fear from someone who can use magic than you do from anyone else? Someone can commit a crime with inherent or learned magic abilities, a sword, a gun, a lase-torch " one's no different than the other. The use of magic is a talent, sometimes a difficult one to control. Like any talent, we can elect to use them for benevolence or for wickedness. That's a choice we all make on a daily basis. Some decide to use their skills and talents to commit crimes, some do not. The ability to use magic or not doesn't factor into that decision. Magic users are not prone to criminal acts simply because they can use magic. A magic user can have or cause an accident just as any of else can when using our own talents.

The Governor pauses, saying his next words with emphasis.

Let me be absolutely clear. I do not believe that those who can use magic are, in any way, more apt to commit a violent act or crime than anybody else. The measure suggests that magic users require regulation to keep the rest of us safe. I disagree wholeheartedly. Proposition Thirty-Seven claims it will "provide appropriate incentives and rewards to magic-user registration, and swiftly and justly encourage the unregistered to be licensed". If we want to discuss generalizations and ambiguity, this statement from Section Three, Point D, is exactly that. What incentives" What rewards" Why would the measure reward those it seeks to censure and those it implies are violent and require governmental regulation and control to supervise"

I will not endorse or support Proposition Thirty-Seven. It's too vague, too ambiguous, too generic, and too wasteful. Its claims are unsubstantiated; it makes no effort to prove its allegations. Its call for censure and labeling of a specific group is offensive. I will do my utmost to convince you of all this and to send this measure down in resounding defeat.

Again, I plead for calm. It's my sincere hope that the violence surrounding and because of this ill-worded measure will stop immediately. I beseech each one of you to read Proposition Thirty-Seven for yourselves ? don't let anyone, myself included, tell you what it says. Read it. See with your own eyes how it falls short, how it will not accomplish the goals it sets forth, how it cannot support its claims.

Thank you, and may peace once again take hold in our city.

Q&A Session begins.